Popular Articles (Page 2)
Hint: You are looking at the most popular articles. If you are interested in popular topics instead, click here.
π List of Lists of Lists
This is a list of other articles that are lists of list articles on the English Wikipedia. In other words, each of the articles linked here is an index to multiple lists on a topic. Some of the linked articles are themselves lists of lists of lists. This article is also a list of lists, and also a list itself.
Discussed on
- "List of Lists of Lists" | 2021-09-22 | 114 Upvotes 20 Comments
- "List of Lists of Lists" | 2021-07-14 | 13 Upvotes 1 Comments
- "List of Lists of Lists" | 2020-10-25 | 16 Upvotes 1 Comments
- "List of Lists of Lists β Wikipedia" | 2020-06-24 | 14 Upvotes 5 Comments
- "List of Lists of Lists" | 2019-10-29 | 18 Upvotes 7 Comments
- "Wikipedia: List of lists of lists" | 2018-05-03 | 112 Upvotes 16 Comments
- "List of lists of lists" | 2016-07-28 | 16 Upvotes 5 Comments
- "Wikipedia's list of lists of lists" | 2012-02-02 | 195 Upvotes 50 Comments
π The Thing
The Thing, also known as the Great Seal bug, was one of the first covert listening devices (or "bugs") to use passive techniques to transmit an audio signal. It was concealed inside a gift given by the Soviet Union to W. Averell Harriman, the United States Ambassador to the Soviet Union, on August 4, 1945. Because it was passive, needing electromagnetic energy from an outside source to become energized and activate, it is considered a predecessor of Radio-Frequency Identification (RFID) technology.
Discussed on
- "The Thing (Listening Device)" | 2021-06-29 | 14 Upvotes 3 Comments
- "The Thing" | 2019-06-11 | 599 Upvotes 104 Comments
- "Great Seal bug" | 2014-08-13 | 10 Upvotes 1 Comments
- "Thing (listening device)" | 2011-03-03 | 49 Upvotes 8 Comments
π Non-English-based programming languages
Non-English-based programming languages are programming languages that do not use keywords taken from or inspired by English vocabulary.
Discussed on
- "Non-English-Based Programming Languages" | 2021-10-10 | 10 Upvotes 6 Comments
- "Non-English-based programming languages" | 2019-06-30 | 262 Upvotes 222 Comments
- "Non-English-based programming languages" | 2016-06-23 | 57 Upvotes 18 Comments
- "Non-English-based programming languages" | 2013-09-02 | 77 Upvotes 75 Comments
- "Non-English-based programming languages" | 2009-03-20 | 30 Upvotes 23 Comments
π Langton's Ant
Langton's ant is a two-dimensional universal Turing machine with a very simple set of rules but complex emergent behavior. It was invented by Chris Langton in 1986 and runs on a square lattice of black and white cells. The universality of Langton's ant was proven in 2000. The idea has been generalized in several different ways, such as turmites which add more colors and more states.
Discussed on
- "Langtonβs ant" | 2023-05-17 | 102 Upvotes 23 Comments
- "Langton's Ant" | 2019-06-07 | 115 Upvotes 25 Comments
- "Langton's ant" | 2014-09-03 | 118 Upvotes 42 Comments
- "Langton's ant" | 2011-02-17 | 176 Upvotes 20 Comments
π Potato Paradox
The potato paradox is a mathematical calculation that has a counter-intuitive result. The Universal Book of Mathematics states the problem as follows:
Fred brings home 100 kg of potatoes, which (being purely mathematical potatoes) consist of 99% water. He then leaves them outside overnight so that they consist of 98% water. What is their new weight? The surprising answer is 50 kg.
In Quine's classification of paradoxes, the potato paradox is a veridical paradox.
Discussed on
- "Potato Paradox" | 2022-11-28 | 35 Upvotes 14 Comments
- "Potato paradox" | 2018-08-12 | 232 Upvotes 77 Comments
- "Potato paradox" | 2015-07-15 | 559 Upvotes 132 Comments
π Simpson's Paradox
Simpson's paradox, which goes by several names, is a phenomenon in probability and statistics, in which a trend appears in several different groups of data but disappears or reverses when these groups are combined. This result is often encountered in social-science and medical-science statistics and is particularly problematic when frequency data is unduly given causal interpretations. The paradox can be resolved when causal relations are appropriately addressed in the statistical modeling.
Simpson's paradox has been used as an exemplar to illustrate to the non-specialist or public audience the kind of misleading results mis-applied statistics can generate. Martin Gardner wrote a popular account of Simpson's paradox in his March 1976 Mathematical Games column in Scientific American.
Edward H. Simpson first described this phenomenon in a technical paper in 1951, but the statisticians Karl Pearson et al., in 1899, and Udny Yule, in 1903, had mentioned similar effects earlier. The name Simpson's paradox was introduced by Colin R. Blyth in 1972.
It is also referred to as or Simpson's reversal, YuleβSimpson effect, amalgamation paradox, or reversal paradox.
Discussed on
- "Simpson's Paradox" | 2024-03-11 | 365 Upvotes 106 Comments
- "Simpsonβs Paradox" | 2022-02-06 | 11 Upvotes 3 Comments
- "Simpson's paradox" | 2011-07-29 | 174 Upvotes 34 Comments
- "Simpson's paradox: why mistrust seemingly simple statistics" | 2009-08-28 | 152 Upvotes 17 Comments
π Moravec's Paradox
Moravec's paradox is the observation by artificial intelligence and robotics researchers that, contrary to traditional assumptions, reasoning (which is high-level in humans) requires very little computation, but sensorimotor skills (comparatively low-level in humans) require enormous computational resources. The principle was articulated by Hans Moravec, Rodney Brooks, Marvin Minsky and others in the 1980s. As Moravec writes, "it is comparatively easy to make computers exhibit adult level performance on intelligence tests or playing checkers, and difficult or impossible to give them the skills of a one-year-old when it comes to perception and mobility".
Similarly, Minsky emphasized that the most difficult human skills to reverse engineer are those that are unconscious. "In general, we're least aware of what our minds do best", he wrote, and added "we're more aware of simple processes that don't work well than of complex ones that work flawlessly".
Discussed on
- "Moravec's Paradox" | 2023-06-10 | 13 Upvotes 4 Comments
- "Moravec's Paradox" | 2019-08-15 | 155 Upvotes 87 Comments
- "Moravec's paradox" | 2018-04-21 | 30 Upvotes 6 Comments
- "Moravec's paradox" | 2016-02-06 | 30 Upvotes 4 Comments
- "Moravec's paradox" | 2012-12-14 | 188 Upvotes 43 Comments
π Two Envelopes Problem
The two envelopes problem, also known as the exchange paradox, is a brain teaser, puzzle, or paradox in logic, probability, and recreational mathematics. It is of special interest in decision theory, and for the Bayesian interpretation of probability theory. Historically, it arose as a variant of the necktie paradox. The problem typically is introduced by formulating a hypothetical challenge of the following type:
It seems obvious that there is no point in switching envelopes as the situation is symmetric. However, because you stand to gain twice as much money if you switch while risking only a loss of half of what you currently have, it is possible to argue that it is more beneficial to switch. The problem is to show what is wrong with this argument.
Discussed on
- "Two Envelopes Problem" | 2022-05-30 | 249 Upvotes 300 Comments
- "Two envelopes problem" | 2013-11-11 | 11 Upvotes 1 Comments
- "Two envelopes problem" | 2013-09-14 | 42 Upvotes 88 Comments
- "Two Envelopes Problem" | 2010-08-06 | 112 Upvotes 88 Comments
π Gimli Glider
Air Canada FlightΒ 143 was a Canadian scheduled domestic passenger flight between Montreal and Edmonton that ran out of fuel on JulyΒ 23, 1983, at an altitude of 41,000 feet (12,000Β m), midway through the flight. The crew was able to glide the Boeing 767 aircraft safely to an emergency landing at a former Royal Canadian Air Force base in Gimli, Manitoba, that had been turned into a motor racing track. This unusual aviation incident earned the aircraft the nickname "Gimli Glider".
The subsequent investigation revealed that a combination of company failures, human errors and confusion over unit measures had led to the aircraft being refuelled with insufficient fuel for the planned flight.
Discussed on
- "Gimli Glider" | 2016-12-18 | 385 Upvotes 198 Comments
- "Gimli Glider" | 2014-05-01 | 176 Upvotes 80 Comments
- "Gimli Glider: When systems go wrong." | 2009-10-23 | 26 Upvotes 9 Comments
π GoiΓ’nia radiation accident
The GoiΓ’nia accident [Ι‘ojΛjΙniΙ] was a radioactive contamination accident that occurred on September 13, 1987, in GoiΓ’nia, in the Brazilian state of GoiΓ‘s, after a forgotten radiotherapy source was taken from an abandoned hospital site in the city. It was subsequently handled by many people, resulting in four deaths. About 112,000 people were examined for radioactive contamination and 249 of them were found to have been contaminated.
In the cleanup operation, topsoil had to be removed from several sites, and several hundred houses were demolished. All the objects from within those houses, including personal possessions, were seized and incinerated. Time magazine has identified the accident as one of the world's "worst nuclear disasters" and the International Atomic Energy Agency called it "one of the world's worst radiological incidents".
Discussed on
- "GoiΓ’nia Accident" | 2023-02-01 | 298 Upvotes 185 Comments
- "The GoiΓ’nia Accident (1987)" | 2021-11-06 | 205 Upvotes 121 Comments
- "GoiΓ’nia Accident" | 2020-06-27 | 21 Upvotes 2 Comments
- "GoiΓ’nia radiation accident" | 2013-08-08 | 14 Upvotes 4 Comments