Topic: Philosophy (Page 9)

You are looking at all articles with the topic "Philosophy". We found 167 matches.

Hint: To view all topics, click here. Too see the most popular topics, click here instead.

πŸ”— Bicameralism (Psychology)

πŸ”— Philosophy πŸ”— Skepticism πŸ”— Psychology πŸ”— Philosophy/Contemporary philosophy πŸ”— Philosophy/Philosophy of mind πŸ”— Alternative Views πŸ”— Neuroscience

Bicameralism (the condition of being divided into "two-chambers") is a hypothesis in psychology that argues that the human mind once operated in a state in which cognitive functions were divided between one part of the brain which appears to be "speaking", and a second part which listens and obeysβ€”a bicameral mind. The term was coined by Julian Jaynes, who presented the idea in his 1976 book The Origin of Consciousness in the Breakdown of the Bicameral Mind, wherein he made the case that a bicameral mentality was the normal and ubiquitous state of the human mind as recently as 3,000 years ago, near the end of the Mediterranean bronze age.

Discussed on

πŸ”— Walking Stewart

πŸ”— Biography πŸ”— Philosophy πŸ”— Philosophy/Philosophers

John "Walking" Stewart (19 February 1747 – 20 February 1822) was an English philosopher and traveller. Stewart developed a unique system of materialistic pantheism.

Discussed on

πŸ”— Holodomor

πŸ”— Human rights πŸ”— Soviet Union πŸ”— Crime πŸ”— Death πŸ”— Philosophy πŸ”— Discrimination πŸ”— Philosophy/Ethics πŸ”— Soviet Union/history of Russia πŸ”— Soviet Union/Russia πŸ”— Ukraine πŸ”— Ethnic groups

The Holodomor (Ukrainian: Голодомо́р; Голодомо́р Π² Украї́ні; derived from ΠΌΠΎΡ€ΠΈΡ‚ΠΈ Π³ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠΌ, "to kill by starvation") was a man-made famine in Soviet Ukraine in 1932 and 1933 that killed millions of Ukrainians. It is also known as the Terror-Famine and Famine-Genocide in Ukraine, and sometimes referred to as the Great Famine or the Ukrainian Genocide of 1932–33. It was part of the wider Soviet famine of 1932–33, which affected the major grain-producing areas of the country. During the Holodomor, millions of inhabitants of Ukraine, the majority of whom were ethnic Ukrainians, died of starvation in a peacetime catastrophe unprecedented in the history of Ukraine. Since 2006, the Holodomor has been recognized by Ukraine and 15 other countries as a genocide of the Ukrainian people carried out by the Soviet government.

Early estimates of the death toll by scholars and government officials varied greatly. According to higher estimates, up to 12 million ethnic Ukrainians were said to have perished as a result of the famine. A U.N. joint statement signed by 25 countries in 2003 declared that 7–10 million perished. Research has since narrowed the estimates to between 3.3 and 7.5 million. According to the findings of the Court of Appeal of Kiev in 2010, the demographic losses due to the famine amounted to 10 million, with 3.9 million direct famine deaths, and a further 6.1 million birth deficits.

The term Holodomor emphasises the famine's man-made and intentional aspects, such as rejection of outside aid, confiscation of all household foodstuffs, and restriction of population movement. Whether the Holodomor was genocide is still the subject of academic debate, as are the causes of the famine and intentionality of the deaths. Some scholars believe that the famine was planned by Joseph Stalin to eliminate a Ukrainian independence movement. The loss of life has been compared to that of the Holocaust. However, some historians dispute its characterization as a genocide.

Discussed on

πŸ”— Francisco Varela

πŸ”— Biography πŸ”— Religion πŸ”— Philosophy πŸ”— Systems πŸ”— Biography/science and academia πŸ”— Systems/Cybernetics πŸ”— Philosophy/Philosophers πŸ”— Alternative Views πŸ”— Buddhism πŸ”— Religion/Interfaith πŸ”— Chile

Francisco Javier Varela GarcΓ­a (September 7, 1946 – May 28, 2001) was a Chilean biologist, philosopher, cybernetician, and neuroscientist who, together with his mentor Humberto Maturana, is best known for introducing the concept of autopoiesis to biology, and for co-founding the Mind and Life Institute to promote dialog between science and Buddhism.

Discussed on

πŸ”— The Analytical Language of John Wilkins

πŸ”— Philosophy πŸ”— Languages

"The Analytical Language of John Wilkins" (Spanish: "El idioma analΓ­tico de John Wilkins") is a short essay by Argentine writer Jorge Luis Borges, first printed in La NaciΓ³n on 8 February 1942 and subsequently published in Otras Inquisiciones (1937–1952). It is a critique of the English natural philosopher and writer John Wilkins's proposal for a universal language and of the representational capacity of language generally. In it, Borges imagines a bizarre and whimsical (and fictional) Chinese taxonomy later quoted by Michel Foucault, David Byrne, and others.

Discussed on

πŸ”— McNamara Fallacy

πŸ”— United States πŸ”— Military history πŸ”— Philosophy πŸ”— Philosophy/Logic πŸ”— Military history/Military biography

The McNamara fallacy (also known as the quantitative fallacy), named for Robert McNamara, the US Secretary of Defense from 1961 to 1968, involves making a decision based solely on quantitative observations (or metrics) and ignoring all others. The reason given is often that these other observations cannot be proven.

The first step is to measure whatever can be easily measured. This is OK as far as it goes. The second step is to disregard that which can't be easily measured or to give it an arbitrary quantitative value. This is artificial and misleading. The third step is to presume that what can't be measured easily really isn't important. This is blindness. The fourth step is to say that what can't be easily measured really doesn't exist. This is suicide.

The fallacy refers to McNamara's belief as to what led the United States to defeat in the Vietnam Warβ€”specifically, his quantification of success in the war (e.g., in terms of enemy body count), ignoring other variables.

Discussed on

πŸ”— Essentially contested concept

πŸ”— Philosophy πŸ”— Philosophy/Aesthetics πŸ”— Philosophy/Social and political philosophy πŸ”— Philosophy/Philosophy of religion

In a paper delivered to the Aristotelian Society on 12 March 1956, Walter Bryce Gallie (1912–1998) introduced the term essentially contested concept to facilitate an understanding of the different applications or interpretations of the sorts of abstract, qualitative, and evaluative notionsβ€”such as "art", "philanthropy" and "social justice"β€”used in the domains of aesthetics, development, political philosophy, philosophy of history, and philosophy of religion.

Garver (1978) describes their use as follows:

The term essentially contested concepts gives a name to a problematic situation that many people recognize: that in certain kinds of talk there is a variety of meanings employed for key terms in an argument, and there is a feeling that dogmatism ("My answer is right and all others are wrong"), skepticism ("All answers are equally true (or false); everyone has a right to his own truth"), and eclecticism ("Each meaning gives a partial view so the more meanings the better") are none of them the appropriate attitude towards that variety of meanings.

Essentially contested concepts involve widespread agreement on a concept (e.g., "fairness"), but not on the best realization thereof. They are "concepts the proper use of which inevitably involves endless disputes about their proper uses on the part of their users", and these disputes "cannot be settled by appeal to empirical evidence, linguistic usage, or the canons of logic alone".

Discussed on

πŸ”— List of important publications in philosophy

πŸ”— History πŸ”— Lists πŸ”— Philosophy πŸ”— Philosophy/Philosophical literature πŸ”— Bibliographies

This is a list of important publications in philosophy, organized by field. The publications on this list are regarded as important because they have served or are serving as one or more of the following roles:

  • Foundation – A publication whose ideas would go on to be the foundation of a topic or field within philosophy.
  • Breakthrough – A publication that changed or added to philosophical knowledge significantly.
  • Influence – A publication that has had a significant impact on the academic study of philosophy or the world.

Discussed on

πŸ”— Turtles All the Way Down

πŸ”— Philosophy πŸ”— Philosophy/Philosophy of religion

"Turtles all the way down" is an expression of the problem of infinite regress. The saying alludes to the mythological idea of a World Turtle that supports the earth on its back. It suggests that this turtle rests on the back of an even larger turtle, which itself is part of a column of increasingly large world turtles that continues indefinitely (i.e., "turtles all the way down").

The exact origin of the phrase is uncertain. In the form "rocks all the way down", the saying appears as early as 1838. References to the saying's mythological antecedents, the World Turtle and its counterpart the World Elephant, were made by a number of authors in the 17th and 18th centuries. This mythology is frequently assumed to have originated in ancient India and other Hinduist beliefs.

The expression has been used to illustrate problems such as the regress argument in epistemology.

Discussed on

πŸ”— Scientism

πŸ”— Philosophy πŸ”— Skepticism πŸ”— Philosophy/Logic πŸ”— Philosophy/Social and political philosophy πŸ”— Philosophy/Philosophy of science πŸ”— Sociology πŸ”— Science

Scientism is the promotion of science as the best or only objective means by which society should determine normative and epistemological values. The term scientism is generally used critically, implying a cosmetic application of science in unwarranted situations considered not amenable to application of the scientific method or similar scientific standards.

Discussed on